Don’t get in trouble with the law on April Fool’s Day

27th March 2019

With April Fool’s Day almost upon us, people up and down the country will be planning the best and funniest pranks to play on friends and colleagues. From phony news to foamy shoes it’s the time of year when everyone’s funny bone is being finely tuned. But when does the line between hilarious and harsh get crossed and can a prank turn into legal proceedings?

Jordan Brown, legal adviser from DAS Law has some rules for the prankster…

What is the law’s position on carrying out April Fool’s jokes at work?

Even though it’s the 1st of April, the normal rules governing your behaviour in the workplace still apply.

When is a ‘prank’ considered going too far in the eyes of the law?

Most people can enjoy a joke, but all too often someone oversteps the mark. And even if the joke is within reasonable limits, a colleague may still react very badly.

At the very least, practical jokes could contravene a company’s internal Health and Safety or Dignity at Work policies. At their worst they could result in litigation or police involvement.

A famous example occurred in 2014 when an employee in a US high school sent a text to her daughter saying there she heard gunfire and was hiding in one of the classrooms. Her daughter then alerted the police who attended the school to find nothing wrong; they subsequently arrested the employee for breach of the peace.

Could an April Fool’s prank be considered workplace harassment?

Absolutely! Employers have a duty of care to their employees in ensuring a harassment-free workplace. Certain practical jokes or pranks could be construed as fostering or encouraging an unsafe or even discriminatory work environment if they created a degrading, hostile or intimidating environment for other employees based on a ‘protected characteristic’ such as sex, race, disability, sexuality, gender reassignment, age etc.

Can employers be held liable for employees’ practical jokes?

Employers can and are held liable for an employee’s practical jokes or behaviour (ie vicarious liability). Vicarious liability refers to a situation where someone is held responsible for the actions of another person. In a workplace context, an employer can be liable for the behaviour of its employees provided it can be shown that they took place in the course of their employment.

An employer would need to show that they did not tolerate or accept this behaviour. To do this they would need evidence such as having a firm policy on acceptable behaviour and bullying/harassment and showing that they investigate and sanction breaches of the policy consistently.

Are there any UK examples of an April Fool’s prank resulting in a lawsuit?

In the case of Otomewo v Carphone Warehouse Ltd [2013] two employees took their manager’s phone and changed his Facebook status saying that he had “finally come out of the closet” and that he was “gay and proud”.

The employees knew that the manager was not gay; however the manager subsequently brought a claim for sexual orientation discrimination against the company. He was successful in the employment tribunal, which held that the behaviour of the two employees was “in the course of employment” and that Carphone Warehouse was liable.

Can an employer ban April Fool’s jokes from being carried out in the workplace?

While it might be considered unfair and damaging to company morale, the reality is that April Fool’s pranks have no place in the modern work environment.

Never forget that pranks require ‘victims’, and if an individual feels alienated, bullied or harassed by fellow employees, they may raise a grievance or ultimately make an Employment Tribunal claim against the company.

This not only damages the working environment and may affect productivity and business generally, but it may also result in adverse media coverage, and could even result in unlimited fines if the prank amounts to a serious breach of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.

Disclaimer: This information is for general guidance regarding rights and responsibilities and is not formal legal advice as no lawyer-client relationship has been created.

Is a hug harassment in the workplace?

Following the news that employees at fashion house Ted Baker have launched a petition over ‘forced hugging’, DAS Law’s Lucy Kenyon looks at what is acceptable in the workplace, and what could be considered harassment.

January 2019 Learn more
How to avoid workplace discrimination in your business

Businesses must do all they can to prevent discrimination in the workplace and being up-to-date with equality law is essential.

April 2018 Learn more

Read more from the DAS Law blog

Employment disputes How to deal with mental health discrimination at work

There are legal protections in place to support those with a mental health condition. Here’s what you need to know if you are being treated unfairly at work because of your mental health.

October 2020
Employment disputes , Growing your business , Protecting your business , Setting up a business Farming tenancies: what you need to know

Mark Woodman, Solicitor at DAS Law, looks at what farmers need to know regarding a Farm Business Tenancy.

August 2020
Employment disputes Employing farm workers: what you need to know

Finding employees who will be a long-term asset for your business can be an arduous and stressful process. Here are the myriad rules and regulations that you need to be aware of from the outset.

August 2020
Employment disputes , Protecting your business What businesses need to do when coming out of Covid-19 lockdown

The government recently announced the easing of lockdown restrictions for many businesses across the country. Nevertheless, health & safety and social distancing measures still apply.

July 2020
Employment disputes , Protecting your business 6 tips for giving your business a “spring clean”

As we slowly exit lockdown, this is the ideal opportunity to spend some time giving your business a ‘spring clean’. Hayley Marles has six tips for a clean and tidy SME.

July 2020
Employment disputes Can employees refuse to return to work if they feel unsafe?

Can an employee refuse to return to work due to fears of contracting Covid-19? Where does the law stand if employees decide to ‘take a stand’?

July 2020
Employment disputes Flexible furlough: what you need to know

Employers are left trying to understand how the recently ‘flexible’ CJRS can be used as we come out of lockdown and more businesses reopen and bring back their workforces.

June 2020
Employment disputes Redundancy: an employer’s guide

Hayley Marles and Simon Roberts – both Senior Associates at DAS Law – look at what an employer needs to know about redundancy.

June 2020
Employment disputes Redundancy: an employee’s guide

Hayley Marles and Simon Roberts – both Senior Associates at DAS Law – look at what an employee needs to know about redundancy.

June 2020
Employment disputes , Protecting your business The return to work: a guide for employers

Lucy Kenyon looks at what employers need to consider when returning employees to work.

May 2020
Employment disputes The Job Retention Scheme: have you got it right?

DAS Law Associate Carly Owen looks at the latest developments regarding the government’s Job Retention Scheme.

May 2020
Employment disputes , Protecting your business Health and safety and computers

Employers need to manage the risks to their employees of working at computers for long periods of time. DAS Law’s Bethan Mack explains.

May 2020
Employment disputes ‘Self-isolation’ – what it means and its possible impact on your rights and pay

More and more people in the UK are being told to self-isolate to minimise the spread of the Coronavirus. What impact will this have on workers’ rights and pay?

February 2020