Don’t get in trouble with the law on April Fool’s Day

27th March 2019

With April Fool’s Day almost upon us, people up and down the country will be planning the best and funniest pranks to play on friends and colleagues. From phony news to foamy shoes it’s the time of year when everyone’s funny bone is being finely tuned. But when does the line between hilarious and harsh get crossed and can a prank turn into legal proceedings?

Jordan Brown, legal adviser from DAS Law has some rules for the prankster…

What is the law’s position on carrying out April Fool’s jokes at work?

Even though it’s the 1st of April, the normal rules governing your behaviour in the workplace still apply.

When is a ‘prank’ considered going too far in the eyes of the law?

Most people can enjoy a joke, but all too often someone oversteps the mark. And even if the joke is within reasonable limits, a colleague may still react very badly.

At the very least, practical jokes could contravene a company’s internal Health and Safety or Dignity at Work policies. At their worst they could result in litigation or police involvement.

A famous example occurred in 2014 when an employee in a US high school sent a text to her daughter saying there she heard gunfire and was hiding in one of the classrooms. Her daughter then alerted the police who attended the school to find nothing wrong; they subsequently arrested the employee for breach of the peace.

Could an April Fool’s prank be considered workplace harassment?

Absolutely! Employers have a duty of care to their employees in ensuring a harassment-free workplace. Certain practical jokes or pranks could be construed as fostering or encouraging an unsafe or even discriminatory work environment if they created a degrading, hostile or intimidating environment for other employees based on a ‘protected characteristic’ such as sex, race, disability, sexuality, gender reassignment, age etc.

Can employers be held liable for employees’ practical jokes?

Employers can and are held liable for an employee’s practical jokes or behaviour (ie vicarious liability). Vicarious liability refers to a situation where someone is held responsible for the actions of another person. In a workplace context, an employer can be liable for the behaviour of its employees provided it can be shown that they took place in the course of their employment.

An employer would need to show that they did not tolerate or accept this behaviour. To do this they would need evidence such as having a firm policy on acceptable behaviour and bullying/harassment and showing that they investigate and sanction breaches of the policy consistently.

Are there any UK examples of an April Fool’s prank resulting in a lawsuit?

In the case of Otomewo v Carphone Warehouse Ltd [2013] two employees took their manager’s phone and changed his Facebook status saying that he had “finally come out of the closet” and that he was “gay and proud”.

The employees knew that the manager was not gay; however the manager subsequently brought a claim for sexual orientation discrimination against the company. He was successful in the employment tribunal, which held that the behaviour of the two employees was “in the course of employment” and that Carphone Warehouse was liable.

Can an employer ban April Fool’s jokes from being carried out in the workplace?

While it might be considered unfair and damaging to company morale, the reality is that April Fool’s pranks have no place in the modern work environment.

Never forget that pranks require ‘victims’, and if an individual feels alienated, bullied or harassed by fellow employees, they may raise a grievance or ultimately make an Employment Tribunal claim against the company.

This not only damages the working environment and may affect productivity and business generally, but it may also result in adverse media coverage, and could even result in unlimited fines if the prank amounts to a serious breach of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.

Disclaimer: This information is for general guidance regarding rights and responsibilities and is not formal legal advice as no lawyer-client relationship has been created.

Is a hug harassment in the workplace?

Following the news that employees at fashion house Ted Baker have launched a petition over ‘forced hugging’, DAS Law’s Lucy Kenyon looks at what is acceptable in the workplace, and what could be considered harassment.

January 2019 Learn more
How to avoid workplace discrimination in your business

Businesses must do all they can to prevent discrimination in the workplace and being up-to-date with equality law is essential.

April 2018 Learn more

Read more from the DAS Law blog

Employment disputes , Protecting your business How working time regulations can limit your employees’ hours

A study by French researchers has highlighted some of the health risks faced by those working long hours. Sarah Garner, Solicitor at DAS Law, looks at the specific rules and regulations regarding the working day.

July 2019
Employment disputes When should a condition be classified as a disability?

DAS Law Senior Associate and Legal Executive Tessa Faverty considers this crucial question, drawing on her professional expertise, and personal experience.

June 2019
Employment disputes Can an employer ban working from home?

A recent ban on working from home at BNY Mellon raised questions about what an employee’s rights are when it comes to working from home.

June 2019
Employment disputes Scope of ‘injury to feelings’ expanded by employment tribunal

In employment law, awards for ‘injury to feelings’ have historically been permitted only in claims linked to discrimination, whistleblowing, and trade union membership, but the situation may now have changed.

May 2019
Employment disputes , Protecting your business When can company directors be personally liable?

The recent High Court case of Antzuzis & Others v DJ Houghton Catching Services & Others is a stark reminder of how company directors can be personally liable for their acts.

May 2019
Employment disputes 10 employment law changes to look out for

Hayley Marles highlights ten changes that HR professionals & business owners need to be aware of, including Brexit immigration rule changes.

April 2019
Employment disputes , Protecting your business 6 tips for giving your business a “spring clean”

Are your staff handbooks up-to-date? Are your staff taking all of their holiday allowance? Give your business a spring clean with these six tips for a clean and tidy SME.

April 2019
Employment disputes What to do if your employer stops you working from home

Lindsey Hunt, Legal Adviser at DAS Law, provides some insight regarding employees and their right to work from home.

March 2019
Employment disputes The Big Gig Rejig – what employers should know about the gig economy

DAS Law Solicitor John Griffiths explains what the ‘gig economy’ means and how businesses can help themselves today when it comes to clearly defining the status of their people.

March 2019
Employment disputes 9 things employers need to know about apprenticeships

With National Apprenticeship Week approaching, we explain what employers need to consider regarding apprenticeship schemes and their legal obligations.

February 2019
Employment disputes How veganism could soon be protected by law

In March this year an employment tribunal will have the task of deciding whether veganism is protected by law. DAS Law’s Emyr Gwynne-Thomas takes a look at the case and some of the key questions it raises…

February 2019
Employment disputes Your rights if it’s too cold in the workplace

As the winter weather arrives with a vengeance, chilly workplaces across the UK are potentially having serious impacts on the health and effectiveness of employees.

January 2019
Employment disputes Winter commuting: I thawed the law

If you run your own business, bad weather can cause chaos when staff can’t get in. What employment law regulations are in place when handling transport troubles in winter?

January 2019