Suspension: a neutral act?

9th January 2018

This article first appeared in Legal Futures.

I suspect that many in the industry were as surprised as I was to read the decision in the case of Agoreyo v London Borough of Lambeth [2017] recently, which determined that suspension was in fact not a ‘neutral act’ and instead can amount to a repudiatory breach of the implied term of trust and confidence.

The case related to a teacher accused of using unreasonable force against pupils on three separate occasions. The employer suspended in advance of investigating the allegations; the employee resigned on the same day.

The key points of focus in the decision were the perceived failings by the employer in:

  • Not meeting with the employee to get their version of events before deciding to suspend;
  • Not considering whether there was a ‘reasonable and proper cause’ to suspend;
  • Failing to consider alternatives to suspension; and
  • Not explaining why the suspension was necessary.

The court found that had a meeting occurred, the employer would have discovered that two of the three allegations had been dealt with previously. The original Employment Tribunal decision determined that the allegations were a reasonable and proper cause for suspension of the employee to protect the children.

However, the Judge in the High Court disagreed. The reason provided by the employer in the suspension letter said it was to enable them to carry out a fair investigation, but the High Court Judge questioned why a fair investigation could not be carried out with the employee in the workplace.

The High Court Judge also found there was no witness evidence from the employer to support their decision, and therefore the Employment Tribunal Judge had no basis to form this view.

The case referred to Gogay v Hertfordshire County Council [2000] which found that suspension of a care worker accused of child abuse amounted to a breach of the implied term of trust and confidence.

In this case, a child talked during her therapy about the employee in a way which led to a decision to hold an investigation under s.47 of the Children Act 1998, and as a result the employer decided to suspend, pending the outcome of the investigation.

The court made an issue in the way the letter of suspension was drafted – “the issue to be investigated is an allegation of sexual abuse made by a young person”, which caused the employee to suffer from severe depression, and it found that the employer had no reasonable ground to suspend.

In light of these two cases, employers considering whether to suspend are placed in a difficult position.

Must they now keep an employee in place to avoid the stigma associated with suspension, risking that the allegations could be well founded? What about the implications to the employer if the allegations are genuine and they left the employee in the workplace working – as in these cases – with vulnerable individuals? 

How, as employment law professionals are we to advise on this? It’s now a few months down the line and I am still finding that many commercial clients and HR professionals seem to be unaware of this important decision. So, when is it reasonable for our employer clients to suspend?

In general terms, suspension remains – at least in principle – a neutral act, particularly where it is on full pay; I don’t think the decision in Agoreyo has changed this.

However, it has made me reconsider what practical advice we must now give to clients considering suspension, to avoid it being considered a ‘knee-jerk’ reaction, and potentially amounting to a fundamental breach of contract.

Ultimately, the decision is for the employer to weigh-up which risk they’d prefer to take; the suspended employee claiming a breach of the implied trust and confidence in suspending them; or the risk of negligence in having allowed the employee to continue to work.

As well as advising them of the risks, the following are steps I will be advising commercial clients to take:

  • Check there is a term in the contract of employment which gives the employee a right to suspend, and/or in the handbook/policies/procedures.
  • Engage with the individual concerned to ascertain their version of events (and keep detailed notes of the conversation) before communicating any decision.
  • Consider whether there are any available alternatives to suspension, e.g. a temporary move to another department or role, and whether suspension is justifiable.
  • If suspending, fully document the reasons that a suspension was considered necessary.
  • If suspending, try to agree with the employee how their sudden absence will be explained, to avoid/limit any possible reputational damage.
  • Keep the individual concerned updated with the investigation and provide realistic timescales and fully justified reasons for any delay.

With these in place I believe an employer should be well-positioned to show that they can demonstrate a ‘reasonable and proper cause’ to suspend, if that is the path they choose to go down.

Alexandra Owen is an employment solicitor at DAS Law.

Alexandra Owen

Senior Associate (Acting), FCILEX

Learn more
UK employment law advice

We can provide all the advice you need on employment law. Read up on your employment rights and make sure you are being treated fairly in the workplace.

April 2018 Learn more

Read more from the DAS Law blog

Employment disputes Working on Christmas Day – your rights if you end up on the rota

It's a day of rest for millions, but for others it’s double the workload as business continues as normal – but with fewer staff. Can you refuse? Hannah Parsons outlines your rights.

December 2018
General advice , Employment disputes The dos and don’ts of the office Christmas party

Hannah Parsons, solicitor at DAS Law, has the following advice to ensure that your office party does not result in writs and recriminations.

December 2018
Employment disputes International Stress Awareness Day: your workplace rights

For this Wednesday’s International Stress Awareness Day, Hannah Parsons, a solicitor at DAS Law, takes a look at what the law says your employer needs to do about stress.

November 2018
Employment disputes Your rights if it’s too cold in the workplace

As the winter weather arrives with a vengeance, chilly workplaces across the UK are potentially having serious impacts on the health and effectiveness of employees.

October 2018
Employment disputes How to deal with mental health discrimination at work

There are legal protections in place to support those with a mental health condition. Here’s what you need to know if you are being treated unfairly at work because of your mental health.

October 2018
Employment disputes How to navigate employment rights in the gig economy

If you are unsure about your employment status, the rights and benefits that come with it, you need advice from professionals who understand the law.

July 2018
Employment disputes Don’t get a red card while watching the World Cup at work

If you are planning on watching World Cup matches at work there are a number of important things to consider.

July 2018
Employment disputes Winter commuting: I thawed the law

If you run your own business, bad weather can cause chaos when staff can’t get in. What employment law regulations are in place when handling transport troubles in winter?

February 2018
Employment disputes 9 questions and answers about the gig economy

We talked about the basics of the gig economy with Allison Whiston, Head of Employment and Commercial at DAS Law.

February 2018
Employment disputes Suspension: a neutral act?

A decision in a recent case determined that suspension was not a ‘neutral act’ and can amount to a breach of trust and confidence.

January 2018
Employment disputes Constructive & wrongful dismissal

If you feel forced to resign, this may count as constructive dismissal. If you are dismissed in breach of the terms of your employment contract, this is known as wrongful dismissal.

April 2018
Employment disputes , Protecting your business Managing stress in the workplace

For National Stress Awareness Day (Wednesday 1st November), we take a look at what the law says your employer needs to do about stress

October 2017
Employment disputes Disciplinary action

Your employer may take formal disciplinary action against you if they are unhappy with any aspect of your behaviour in the workplace. However they must follow a fair procedure when doing so.

April 2018